bb8cdd964b
The disclaimer was accurate for as long as it stood -- events were not read,
so `pass` was an upper bound and saying otherwise would have been a lie about
the number. It is now a lie in the other direction, so it goes, replaced by
what is actually true: events are compared exactly, in number and in order,
which is what makes a pass mean the engine answered correctly *and* was asked
the right question. The header says plainly that scorecards recorded before
this are not comparable, and enumerates what is still skipped inside events
rather than leaving "asserted" to be read as "asserted completely".
Two facts in the docs had gone stale and are corrected here because this is
the commit that rereads them:
- README said `--op-timeout-ms` defaults to 3 s. It has been 10 s since the
commit that explains, at length and directly above the constant, why 3 s
was wrong. A stale number in exactly the place that warns against
tightening it is worse than no number.
- `MAX_SCHEMA` is [1, 24]; the comment above it still claimed 1.0-1.9.
Totals unchanged at 159/132/196 -- this commit only rewrites prose, and the
scorecard is re-recorded so its header matches the runner that produced it.
41 KiB
41 KiB