Files
MultiforaDB/tests/spec/indexes
A.Shakhmatov bf685aa6de plan/spec: hashed indexes are done, the implication test is next
`tests/spec/indexes/` is 42/42, so all four recorded corpora are green:
positional 51, operators 125, indexes 42, aggregate 70.

Records what implementing the row taught, including the three things the
design review got wrong. Two were already noted when the corpus was
recorded ($in is allowed; a differing filter is 86); the third is new and
cheaper than the review's version: hashed needs no flags bit, because it
belongs to a key *component* and the per-component direction byte was
already there holding 0 or 1.

Also fixes a corpus case that did not measure what it said. "equality
across numeric types" sent an int32, because a source is plain JSON and
`5.0` is `5` after JSON.parse -- it was a second copy of the case above
it. Reading sources as EJSON was tried and reverted, and the recorder now
says why: EJSON's wrapper namespace collides with the query operators
these sources are made of, so `{"$regex": "x"}` became a BSONRegExp,
`structuredClone` flattened it to `{pattern, options}`, and "a filter
using $regex is refused" silently became a filter mongod accepts. The
cross-type property is a unit test instead, which is where it belongs --
it is about how this server hashes, and mongod's hash is a different
function, so a corpus could only ever check the answer.

The case is renamed to what it does measure rather than deleted: two
documents sharing a value is still the read a hashed index exists for.

Verified: 256/256 unit tests in ReleaseFast and ReleaseSafe, 87/87 fuzz,
all four corpora 0 fail, pinned scorecard unchanged at 228/63/196, the
full e2e matrix and crash-fuzz green.
2026-08-11 00:06:33 +03:00
..

The index corpus

M3's last row: partial and hashed indexes. docs/M3_INDEX_TYPES_DESIGN_REVIEW.md measured both against mongod 8.3.7 and found they were not the same kind of gap — hashed was honestly refused, partialFilterExpression was accepted and ignored, and a unique partial index therefore refused inserts mongod accepts.

It also found that no test in this repository covered that row, in any suite. The pinned corpus is crud and aggregate; tests/e2e/e2e5.js and e2e6.js test indexes and write neither a partial nor a hashed spec. So this directory exists for the same reason tests/spec/positional/ and tests/spec/operators/ do.

The one rule

Inputs are authored here; expectations are measured against a real mongod.

tests/spec/indexes/
  sources/*.json      documents + operations, authored
  record.js           runs them against mongod, writes the expectations
  *.json              generated, unified format, do not hand-edit
mongod --port 27099 --dbpath <dir>
node tests/spec/indexes/record.js --mongod-port 27099
node tests/spec/run.js --suite-dir tests/spec/indexes

Unlike the other two corpora, a case here is a sequence: create an index, insert against it, read back, list it. An index outlives a deleteMany, and every case is about which indexes exist, so the recorder drops the collection between cases and walks each case's operations in order — stopping at the first that throws, which is what a client would see.

Sources are plain JSON, not EJSON, and that costs something worth stating: a source cannot name a BSON type the JSON grammar has no syntax for, so 5.0 reaches the driver as an int32. Reading them as EJSON was tried and reverted — EJSON's wrapper namespace collides with the query operators these sources are made of. {"$regex": "x"} parses to a BSONRegExp, structuredClone flattens it to {pattern, options}, and "a filter using $regex is refused" silently became a filter mongod accepts.

Where it stands

Recorded against mongod 8.3.7 at 3/39 -- red by construction -- and both halves have since been driven green:

hashed.json    18 pass    0 fail   0 skip
partial.json   24 pass    0 fail   0 skip

The three that passed at the start were the reads a partial index does not change: this server indexed every document, so a query still found everything, which is the whole reason the review called the partial gap smaller than the arrayFilters one.

The last one to go green was not about indexes at all. find({a: null}) has to match a document with no a, and this server matched only an explicit null — with or without an index. No other test in the repository asks, and the pinned crud+aggregate scorecard did not move when it was fixed.

What recording it settled

Two of the review's own guesses were wrong, which is why it was recorded rather than reasoned:

mongod
$in in a partial filter allowed — the review listed it with $ne and $regex
same key, different filter, no explicit name IndexKeySpecsConflict (86), not the 67 the review assumed

And what it confirmed:

mongod
a unique partial index constrains only the documents its filter selects — two {a: 1, t: false} are fine, two {a: 9, t: true} are E11000
a document leaving the filter frees the value it held for another document to take
a document entering the filter must take a value nothing inside it holds, or the update is E11000
$regex, $ne in a filter 67
a filter that is not a document TypeMismatch (14)
sparse + partialFilterExpression 67 — may not be combined
expireAfterSeconds + a filter allowed; listIndexes reports the filter before the expiry
an empty filter allowed, and reported
two hashed components 31303
unique on a hashed index 16764
an array at a hashed path 16766, at insert time, not at creation
a key direction that is not 1, -1 or "hashed" 67
a hashed index beside an ascending one on the same field both exist
a range query or a sort over a hashed field still correct — the planner declines the index rather than misusing it

And what implementing hashed then measured, none of which the review had:

mongod
codeName for 31303 and 16764 Location31303 / Location16764 — bare location numbers with no name
codeName for {a: "bogus"} CannotCreateIndex, the named 67
16766 on an insert or update a per-document writeError beside ok: 1, so the rest of the batch lands
16766 from createIndexes a command error, over data that already holds an array
a one-element array through the path refused too — the case a value count cannot tell apart from a plain subdocument
an empty array at the path refused
an array inside a subdocument at the path fine — only the path itself matters
hashed with expireAfterSeconds, or with a partial filter both allowed
a direction that is any non-zero, non-NaN number allowed, sign taken as the direction, value echoed verbatim — this server takes only ±1 (PLAN §6)