Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
53f88e6d3b update: replacement-style writes
`replaceOne`, `findOneAndReplace` and `bulkWrite`'s `replaceOne` all failed
with "bad update". `update.apply` rejected any update document whose first key
was not `$`-prefixed, so a replacement document -- which by definition has no
operators -- could not get through at all.

MongoDB decides on the first field and nothing else: `$`-prefixed means
operators, anything else means the document *is* the new content. An empty
document is a replacement too, and a legal one. `is_replacement` says which,
`apply_replacement` does the work, and because all three call sites already go
through `apply`, that one branch covers the update command, findAndModify and
the upsert builder.

What a replacement means, precisely:

  - every field is replaced except `_id`, which is immutable and keeps its
    position at the front, where it is stored and where the `_id_` index
    descends on it;
  - a replacement may restate the same `_id` but not a different one -- that
    is `ImmutableId`, because otherwise a rewrite would silently change a
    document's identity while the index entry kept the old key;
  - when the target has no `_id` yet, the replacement supplies it. That is the
    upsert path: `build_upsert_doc` seeds a document from the filter's
    equalities, so `replaceOne({_id: 99}, {u: 1}, {upsert: true})` inserts
    `{_id: 99, u: 1}` and not a generated ObjectId;
  - a mixed document is refused from either side, rather than guessed at.

Two options on update specs are refused rather than ignored:

  - `multi` with a replacement (FailedToParse). A replacement describes one
    document; applying it to many would leave every match identical apart from
    its `_id`.
  - `sort`, a MongoDB 8.0 addition this server does not implement. Ignoring it
    is the worst of the three answers -- `sort` chooses *which* match to write,
    so the client would silently get a different document than it asked for.

  spec scorecard   131 pass / 161 fail  ->  161 pass / 131 fail
  e2e.js           35 checks -> 45

Sixteen spec files improved and none regressed. The two `-sort` files briefly
did: they had been passing on their "server-side error" case, which our
"bad update" failure satisfied by accident, and passing for the wrong reason is
how a gap survives a scorecard.

Five mutations, each verified red: seeding the replacement from the old pairs,
dropping the `_id` comparison, dropping the `_id` a replacement supplies, and
removing the mixed-document guard from either loop.

Note `nModified` is still wrong for a write that changes nothing -- MongoDB
counts a document as modified only if applying the update altered it. That is
the remaining bulkWrite failure and is fixed next, separately.
2026-08-03 23:52:22 +03:00
90de7820da tests/spec: MongoDB spec-test runner and the M0 scorecard
PLAN D2 makes the official specification suites the gate for command semantics;
D7.6 asks for the harness to exist at M0 with a recorded baseline. This is that
harness, pinned on both sides -- mongodb/specifications @ 615e0f9 and
mongodb@7.5.0 -- because a scorecard is only comparable across milestones if a
delta cannot be an upstream test change.

It implements the unified format's Evaluating Matches algorithm as written,
including the two rules that decide whether a pass is earned: extra keys are
tolerated only in a root document, and numeric types compare flexibly. Anything
unimplemented is a SKIP with a reason, never a pass, and the one assertion class
not yet checked -- expectEvents, i.e. command monitoring -- is disclosed at the
top of the scorecard so `pass` reads as an upper bound.

First honest run: 131 pass, 161 fail, 195 skip over 175 files, zero timeouts.

Getting there took four attempts, and the failures are documented in the README
because each would have shipped a scorecard claiming a compatibility gap that
did not exist. Two were genuine leaks in this runner (clients left open when a
case timed out; clients registered for cleanup only after `await connect()`,
plus abandoned cases still creating more). The third I misdiagnosed as machine
load. The fourth attempt found the real cause: a leaked catalog lock in the
engine, fixed separately, which alone accounts for the jump from 45 passes to
131.

So the runner carries its own guards: per-operation CSOT timeouts so work is
never abandoned, an active-handle census per file, an end-of-run tripwire for
stray timers, a hard stop if the server dies rather than emitting hundreds of
misleading ECONNREFUSED failures, and --skip/--limit for bisecting a run whose
failures depend on position. The README states the rule plainly -- a long
unbroken tail of timeouts is a harness bug until proven otherwise -- and the two
commands that settle it.

Also fixes bench-run.sh, which copied its report over bench-latest.txt
unconditionally, including after a run that only warned -- so a degraded run
could silently replace the baseline that PLAN D7.5 makes a milestone gate.
2026-08-03 18:58:01 +03:00